<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for chritic.com | the technology critic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chritic.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>insightful technology review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Product Review: Palm Centro (GSM) by cachofas</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/product-review-palm-centro-gsm/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>cachofas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Pretty easy to use and very comfortable to handle. It is perfect if you are planning to buy a new smartphone especially because you can use the wifi technology on it.

Really Nice

:-) 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.magnitiendum.com.mx/palms/palm-centro.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Palm Centro - Accesorios Palm Centro&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty easy to use and very comfortable to handle. It is perfect if you are planning to buy a new smartphone especially because you can use the wifi technology on it.</p>
<p>Really Nice</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.magnitiendum.com.mx/palms/palm-centro.php" rel="nofollow">Palm Centro &#8211; Accesorios Palm Centro</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by omid</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/about/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>omid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91</guid>
		<description>yo man i like the website...... this is sweet!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo man i like the website&#8230;&#8230; this is sweet!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Congress Faults Google for Spectrum Auction Problems by PWJ</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/congress-takes-aim-at-google-for-failed-spectrum-auction/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>PWJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=127#comment-81</guid>
		<description>In the interest of completeness, I feel I should mention that Congressman Upton is not the Chairman of the subcommittee. That would be Ed Markey (D-MA).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of completeness, I feel I should mention that Congressman Upton is not the Chairman of the subcommittee. That would be Ed Markey (D-MA).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evite Becoming Outdated, Needs Serious Overhaul by Joe</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/evite-is-outdated-needs-serious-overhaul/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Yes, Evite could be better... but what&#039;s its incentive?  Evite essentially has a monopoly of the online invitation world... I certainly don&#039;t know of any competitors.  It serves its function well, and perhaps there is not motivation to become bigger or better.  Who knows, maybe its profit is marginal, so there is no financial incentive, either, for development.  Of course, if Evite includes features that are not prominently displayed, that&#039;s another issue... one of poor marketing.  But I thought we were talking about technology here.

It&#039;s a Monday morning, so I can be a bit groggy... but does Ben&#039;s comment post mention any notion that wasn&#039;t already covered by the original post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Evite could be better&#8230; but what&#8217;s its incentive?  Evite essentially has a monopoly of the online invitation world&#8230; I certainly don&#8217;t know of any competitors.  It serves its function well, and perhaps there is not motivation to become bigger or better.  Who knows, maybe its profit is marginal, so there is no financial incentive, either, for development.  Of course, if Evite includes features that are not prominently displayed, that&#8217;s another issue&#8230; one of poor marketing.  But I thought we were talking about technology here.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a Monday morning, so I can be a bit groggy&#8230; but does Ben&#8217;s comment post mention any notion that wasn&#8217;t already covered by the original post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evite Becoming Outdated, Needs Serious Overhaul by Shannon</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/evite-is-outdated-needs-serious-overhaul/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I agree very much with the restrictions on creativity. 
Further, just a note: you actually, CAN sync it with your iCal (it&#039;s an option on the right hand side of the evite page), but I agree that something should pop up if you reply &quot;yes,&quot; prompting you to do so.
Finally, evite is not even close to the only option for online invitations.  It&#039;s just the only well-known option. See, e.g., mypunchbowl.com, sendomatic.com, sendaninvite.com, crush3r.com, etc. 
Although I have not used them, I may in the future, b/c many of them seem to allow for more creativity in design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree very much with the restrictions on creativity.<br />
Further, just a note: you actually, CAN sync it with your iCal (it&#8217;s an option on the right hand side of the evite page), but I agree that something should pop up if you reply &#8220;yes,&#8221; prompting you to do so.<br />
Finally, evite is not even close to the only option for online invitations.  It&#8217;s just the only well-known option. See, e.g., mypunchbowl.com, sendomatic.com, sendaninvite.com, crush3r.com, etc.<br />
Although I have not used them, I may in the future, b/c many of them seem to allow for more creativity in design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evite Becoming Outdated, Needs Serious Overhaul by Ben</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/evite-is-outdated-needs-serious-overhaul/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Dude, there are features on evite which do most of this. Emails are sent to the host asking for photos. It allows you to integrate it with Microsoft Outlook. Maybe it should send the photo emails to all yes guests, and allow it to integrate with google calendar, but it does, to some extent, do some of these features already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, there are features on evite which do most of this. Emails are sent to the host asking for photos. It allows you to integrate it with Microsoft Outlook. Maybe it should send the photo emails to all yes guests, and allow it to integrate with google calendar, but it does, to some extent, do some of these features already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facebook to Settle Lawsuit Over Origin, Air Out Dirty Laundry by Facebook Hit With Lawsuit No. 2 Over Origin &#171; chritic.com &#124; the technology critic</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/facebook-to-settle-lawsuit-air-out-dirty-laundry/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Hit With Lawsuit No. 2 Over Origin &#171; chritic.com &#124; the technology critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=104#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] Chritic.com reported here of possible evidence of infringement claims here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chritic.com reported here of possible evidence of infringement claims here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sprint to Launch iPhone Competitor (That Can Actually Compete) by Brandy</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/sprint-to-launch-iphone-competitor-in-june/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=100#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I currently own an IPhone and honestly my only &quot;gripe&quot; is that I am unable to send and recieve picture text messages. I think The Instinct has a lot to live up to considering these other two comments. And I don&#039;t understand what the beginning paragraphs are talking about when they say IPhone bills are $120! My bill averages around $75 a month and I use my phone incessantly. The battery life isn&#039;t so bad, unless I am traveling long distances on the road (since i don&#039;t currently own a car charger.). Anywho, good luck sprint with your new phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently own an IPhone and honestly my only &#8220;gripe&#8221; is that I am unable to send and recieve picture text messages. I think The Instinct has a lot to live up to considering these other two comments. And I don&#8217;t understand what the beginning paragraphs are talking about when they say IPhone bills are $120! My bill averages around $75 a month and I use my phone incessantly. The battery life isn&#8217;t so bad, unless I am traveling long distances on the road (since i don&#8217;t currently own a car charger.). Anywho, good luck sprint with your new phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by MrsL</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/about/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>MrsL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Looks greate Seb - terrific job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks greate Seb &#8211; terrific job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time Warner Ad Misleads, Verizon Hammers Back with Lawsuit by Shannon</title>
		<link>http://chritic.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/time-warner-ad-misleads-verizon-hammers-back-with-lawsuit/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chritic.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I completely agree.  After viewing the commercial, I think it unquestionably leads the viewer to believe that you need a satellite to have FiOS.  It&#039;s materially misleading for sure. 
On another note, if the criticism is that Verizon has similarly misleading commercials, or just that they should relax, who cares? Let them be hypocritical and set a precedent with their suit.  Next time they try to have a similarly misleading commercial, karma will bite them in the ass. The subject of the Verizon commercial will sue, and Verizon will be locked in by the precedent they set with the suit against Timer Warner (assuming, of course, they win). 
Anyway, I just know if I saw this commercial and previously had been considering FiOS, I would think that you definitely had to get a satellite, that I wouldn&#039;t want to deal with that, and that FiOS was no longer a consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.  After viewing the commercial, I think it unquestionably leads the viewer to believe that you need a satellite to have FiOS.  It&#8217;s materially misleading for sure.<br />
On another note, if the criticism is that Verizon has similarly misleading commercials, or just that they should relax, who cares? Let them be hypocritical and set a precedent with their suit.  Next time they try to have a similarly misleading commercial, karma will bite them in the ass. The subject of the Verizon commercial will sue, and Verizon will be locked in by the precedent they set with the suit against Timer Warner (assuming, of course, they win).<br />
Anyway, I just know if I saw this commercial and previously had been considering FiOS, I would think that you definitely had to get a satellite, that I wouldn&#8217;t want to deal with that, and that FiOS was no longer a consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
